OxyFile #561
The Use of Ozone in Orthopedics
Acute and Chronic Painful Diseases of the Joints and Diseases of the
Periarticular Region
Dr. med. C.-H. Siemsen, Buxtehude (Germany)
Dipl.-Ing. BMT
Specialist for orthopedics, sports medicine and chirotherapy,
Lecturer for biomedical technology at the Polytechnical College,
Hamburg.
Abstract:
The application of medical ozone in acute and chronic painful
diseases of the joints is an alternative method of treatment for
obtaining rapid pain relief, decongestion, subsidence of effusions, a
reduction in temperature and an increase in motility. In addition, a
number of therapy-resistant painful diseases of the periarticular
region were treated in this way for the first time.
Knee and shoulder joints presenting acute and chronic pathological
conditions received intraarticular treatment in the following cases:
1. activated gonarthrosis (in the inflammatory stage)
2. acute diseases of the shoulder joint with partially suppressed
motile function (stiffness of the shoulder and shoulder area)
3. chronic diseases of the shoulder joint with calcification and
painful restrictions of movement in the final stage.
Periarticular treatment was carried out on elbow and hip joints
diagnosed as follows:
1. lateral and medial epicondylitis of the humerus (tennis or
athlete's elbow)
2. chronic adductor insertion endopathia (footballer's hip)
3. acute and chronic bursitis trochanteria (e.g. in malformations of
the hip).
The study included:
1. 9 patients (male and female) presenting an acute activated
gonarthrosis
2. 30 patients (male and female) with acute and chronic conditions
in the periarticular region of the shoulder joint
3. 4 patients (male and female) with acute and chronic insertion
tendinitis at the elbow
4. 5 patients (male and female) with acute and chronic insertion
tendopathia and/or bursitis at the hip joint
5. 9 patients (male and female) with systemic orthopedic conditions
and secondary diseases affecting the postural and locomotory
apparatus.
The total quantity applied was administered intraarticularly at the
knee joint following previous puncture of the effusion. Proportional
to the degree of activation of the affected structures, injections
were administered either intraarticularly, subacromially or at the
tuberculum majus in the case of the shoulder joint. In the case of
elbow and hip joints, the affected structure received periarticular
treatment.
The results are presented both subjectively and objectively.
Authors address:
Dr. med. C.-H. Siemsen
Arzt fur Orthopadie
Westfleth 1
21614 Buxtehude (Germany)
Date: 1995